Last year in
London I saw the world's oldest existing copy of the entire New Testament at the
British Museum. It’s called the Codex Sinaiticus and is over 1600 years old. It
is called, “one of the most important
books in the world.”
Is the New Testament
fact or myth? Specifically, between the reported resurrection of Christ and the writing of
the New Testament did the stories change?
Gregory Boyd
writes, “the earliest record of what
followers of Jesus believed comes from the apostle Paul. While most scholars
date the four Gospels between AD 70 and 100, Paul’s letters were written
between the early 50’s and early 60’s.”
That is a span of 20 to 30 years after the events concerning Jesus of
Nazareth. This period is the so-called “silent period.” It’s good to remember
that 1st Century Palestine was an orally dominant culture.
Were the stories
about Jesus passed on accurately? Paul’s letters give us some clues.
First, Paul
expresses a deep concern for passing on established traditions. “Now I praise you that
ye remember me in all things, and hold fast the traditions, even as I delivered
them to you....”
he wrote to the
Corinthians, then adding, “For I received
of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you…”
So by the 50’s these Christians already had fixed teachings.
Secondly, Paul emphasized “teachers.” “It was he who "gave gifts to
people"; he appointed some to be apostles, others to be … teachers…”
he wrote to believers in what is now Turkey. A first century book called the
Didache says, “Elect,
therefore, for yourselves … men who are meek and not covetous, and true and
approved, for they perform for you the service of prophets and teachers… they
are those who are honoured among you ...” These were men of character.
Paul’s third clue regarding
oral transmission is his use of the theme “bearing witness.” Being a witness makes
us think of courtrooms, swearing on a Bible, and fear of the punishment of
perjury. It had similar meaning in the first century. "So then, someone must join us as a witness to the resurrection of
the Lord Jesus…” said Peter before choosing a replacement for Judas, “He
must be one of the men who were in our group during the whole time that the
Lord Jesus traveled about with us…”. Eyewitness
testimony was called for.
Finally, Paul urged his readers
to recollect already known traditions.
“Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the
dead, of the seed of David, according to my gospel…” he told Timothy. We
only remember that which we already know.
Neither the oral traditions nor
the writings of Paul and the Gospels were haphazard or mythical. Boyd
concludes, “Had these authors expressed a
vision of Jesus that was substantially inconsistent with the church’s oral
tradition, that community never would have accepted them.”
No comments:
Post a Comment